My initial reaction to the camera is that the image quality is excellent but I do find the menu a little confusing. We will see how other users comment on how good Fuji has done this. Of course it is a question of how clever things are laid out to have a good compromise. Having a simple interface and having a customizable camera for a lot of situations without diving deep into menus are goals that point into different directions. But that is nothing that I could not learn to use in a short time. Yes - that camera is very customizable, and that has the disadvantage that you can accidentally change settings by using a function button (and there are lots of it - even the command dials offer seperate functions when you press them). I had the GFX for about 18 hours and I did not experience anything like what he describes in his blog. The Fujifilm GFX is not just rocking the boat, the boat has flipped over." Before he had the GFX he wrote: "no one looking for maximum image quality and able to afford things like Zeiss Otus or Leica SL would be in their right mind to choose a 35mm DSLR or a Leica SL or whatever-it makes no sense in this new context. But very often the comments he publishes on the blog are a bit impulsive - very much on the bright or very much on the disappointed side. My general feeling is that he often does look into things very intense, I like that. His problem with not being able to get out of "continous shooting mode" - to me it sounds a bit like one of the bracketing modes was turned on (just an idea). But I read his blog from time to time, and I have read his first comments on the GFX. I am not a subscriber of Lloyd Chambers page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |